 ##  [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1729104761 - 121316736](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1729104761-121316736) 

  [![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/2024-10/download.jpeg?itok=VTYPy4UK)](/individual/ryan-%20younggren)Ryan Younggren

 









 

 



 

 

**[Cass County State Attorney](/north-dakota/cass-county-state-attorney)**

211 9th Street South

Fargo, North Dakota 58103

[(701) 241-5850](tel:%28701%29241-5850)



[https://www.casscou…](https://www.casscountynd.gov/our-county/states-attorney)





 

 



 

 







 

 



 

 

 





## Date of Offense

January 1, 2018





 

 



 

 

## Offense(s)

[Attorney Misconduct](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/attorney-misconduct)





 

 



 

 

 





## Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the [State Bar Association of North Dakota](/north-dakota/state-bar-association-north-dakota)





 

 



 

 

 





## Statement

Ryan Younggren, a longtime prosecutor in Cass County, North Dakota, was involved in a case where prosecutorial misconduct was a significant issue. This misconduct occurred in a child sexual abuse case, where Younggren improperly introduced evidence that had been previously deemed inadmissible. The North Dakota Supreme Court found that Younggren's actions amounted to prosecutorial misconduct because he used evidence that the court had ruled should not have been presented to the jury. This ruling resulted in the case being overturned. Despite this finding, the misconduct was not severe enough to warrant a permanent disbarment or extreme disciplinary actions against Younggren. However, the case sparked discussions on the responsibilities and ethical boundaries of prosecutors within the state, especially in sensitive cases involving criminal accusations.

Younggren has been a prominent figure in Cass County legal circles, having served as a prosecutor for over 15 years and now running for a district judge position in the East Central Judicial District of North Dakota. This background makes the scrutiny of his conduct particularly relevant as he seeks a judicial role.