##  [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1700607510 - 2087788129](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1700607510-2087788129) 

  [![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/default_images/download%20%289%29%20%282%29_0.jpg?itok=5WstKkf1)](/individual/nicole-m-%20diaz)Nicole M Diaz

 









 

 



 

 

**[San Bernardino County District Attorney](/california/san-bernardino-county-district-attorney)**

303 West 3rd Street

San Bernardino, California 92415

[(909) 382-3800](tel:%28909%29382-3800)



[http://sbcountyda.o…](http://sbcountyda.org)





 

 



 

 

 [![San Bernardino County District Attorney](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/2022-03/logo-200x200.png?itok=cckUwrKK "San Bernardino County District Attorney")](/california/san-bernardino-county-district-attorney)





 

 



 

 

 





## Date of Offense

March 6, 2023





 

 



 

 

## Offense(s)

[Attorney Misconduct](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/attorney-misconduct)





[Bias](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty-adjacent/bias)





[Failure to Disclose Brady/Giglio Material](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/failure-disclose-bradygiglio-material)





[Judicial Proceedings](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/judicial-proceedings)





[Obstruction of Justice](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/obstruction-justice)





[Overcharging](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/overcharging)





 

 



 

 

 





## Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the [State Bar of California](/california/state-bar-california)





 

 



 

 

 





## Supporting Document(s)

 [Paper File\_Redacted\[6591\].pdf](/system/files/webform/prosecutor_complaint/2071/Paper%20File_Redacted%5B6591%5D.pdf)

 [IMG\_1174.jpeg](/system/files/webform/prosecutor_complaint/2071/IMG_1174.jpeg)

 

 

 

## Statement

When judge ruled to hold defendant over to trial and said court would have benefited from pics instead of telling him the deputy stated in police report she took pics of all injuries. She withheld evidence of pics to establish extent of victim alleged injuries. Knew deputy lied as to location where deputy spoke with alleged victim. Decided which of two booking applications to use that arresting deputy submitted. He submitted one saying he arrested defendant on outstanding warrant (which was the one he submitted when he booked defendant) and the other was on site arrest. Nicole then question deputy as to arrest saying there was an outstanding warrant knowing it’s not signed by judge as well as aware the deputy never even completed the affidavit