## [Hy, Richard](/individual/richard-%20hy) ![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/2025-05/download%20%283%29.jpg?itok=_uwsrTmE)Richard Hy **[Buffalo Police Department](/new-york/buffalo-police-department)** 68 Court Street Buffalo, New York 14202 [(716) 851-4444](tel:%28716%29851-4444) [![Buffalo Police Department](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/2022-02/Document%20%282%29.png?itok=Vc4tR4SG "Buffalo Police Department")](/new-york/buffalo-police-department) The Buffalo Police Department presents an institutional *Brady/Giglio* concern arising from the formal source record of the United States Department of Justice \[DOJ\] civil-rights investigation, the DOJ Memorandum of Agreement, the Amended Memorandum of Agreement, Special Litigation Section archive materials, and related reform obligations concerning chemical-agent force, reportable use of force, use-of-force documentation, de-escalation training, ethics and truthfulness training, complaint intake, Professional Standards Division investigations, supervisory review, force-and-complaint tracking, trend analysis, corrective action, officer investigation histories, and civil or administrative claims involving officer conduct. The issue is institutional, not an allegation that every BPD officer personally committed misconduct. The *Brady/Giglio* concern is that BPD’s federal reform record creates a heightened witness-system risk affecting the reliability of force reports, complaint histories, arrest reports, investigative narratives, supervisory approvals, affidavits, charging support, and courtroom testimony unless the relevant officer, unit, supervisor, command chain, record system, and case file are affirmatively cleared through transparent, verifiable review. The DOJ investigation record, Memorandum of Agreement, Amended Memorandum of Agreement, and related reform materials constitute potential impeachment and exculpatory evidence wherever BPD personnel supply reports, investigations, arrests, searches, affidavits, charging support, or testimony. The documented reform areas bear directly on force reliability, escalation, report accuracy, complaint credibility, supervisory integrity, training adequacy, truthfulness obligations, misconduct detection, officer discipline, and agency accountability. Prosecutors relying on BPD personnel are on notice of heightened *Brady/Giglio* obligations to identify, obtain, preserve, classify, review, and disclose reform-related impeachment material in time for meaningful defense use. Courts must require disclosure safeguards before relying on BPD-generated testimony or case materials, and POST authorities, bar regulators, and judicial oversight bodies must recognize the certification, ethical, disciplinary, and due-process consequences of undisclosed reform-related impeachment material. The *Brady List* determination is that the Buffalo Police Department is not disclosure-ready unless it demonstrates preservation, classification, transmission, and disclosure of all *Brady/Giglio*-relevant material arising from its DOJ investigation record, federal reform agreements, officer history records, force records, complaint records, supervisory-review materials, and related institutional failures. Until that showing is made, BPD remains subject to heightened *Brady/Giglio* concern, and its witnesses, reports, investigations, arrests, searches, affidavits, and testimony require affirmative credibility review before courtroom reliance. ## Notice of Consent Decree Richard Hy as a member of the [Buffalo Police Department](/new-york/buffalo-police-department) is, jointly and severally, subject to a Consent Decree by the U.S. Department of Justice which directly impacts the individual's and organization's credibility. [Learn more >>>](/consent-decrees) ---