 ##  [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1674511311 - 1558182864](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1674511311-1558182864) 

  [![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/default_images/download%20%289%29%20%282%29_0.jpg?itok=5WstKkf1)](/individual/steven-j-%20carney)Steven J Carney

 









 

 



 

 

**[New London County District Attorney](/connecticut/new-london-county-district-attorney)**

70 Huntington Square

New London, Connecticut 06320

[(860) 443-2835](tel:%28860%29443-2835)



[https://portal.ct.g…](https://portal.ct.gov/DCJ/About-Us/About-Us/Judicial-Districts-and-States-Attorneys)





 

 



 

 

 [![New London County District Attorney](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/2023-01/Connecticut%20Seal.png?itok=wWo1rdRE "New London County District Attorney")](/connecticut/new-london-county-district-attorney)





 

 



 

 

 





## Date of Offense

December 7, 2018





 

 



 

 

## Offense(s)

[Attorney Misconduct](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/attorney-misconduct)





[Bias](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty-adjacent/bias)





[Coercive Plea Bargaining](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/coercive-plea-bargaining)





[Judicial Proceedings](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/judicial-proceedings)





[Overcharging](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/overcharging)





[Suborning Perjury](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/suborning-perjury)





[Witness Tampering](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty-adjacent/witness-tampering)





 

 



 

 

 





## Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the [Connecticut Bar Association](/connecticut/connecticut-bar-association)





 

 



 

 

 





## Statement

The aforementioned prosecutor throughout the course of a criminal trial was caught by the defense inappropriately coaching witnesses, offering coercive plea deals to other parties in the case in exchange for charges dropped, ignorance/ignoring of civil rights in regards to a defendants Autism diagnosis, lying about offering deals after the fact to other parties in a criminal case despite the defense possessing hard copies of deal to the defense when the witness did not say what the prosecution wanted them to say; Furthermore, continued malicious prosecution in retaliation for the case being reversed on appeal and the charges not being re-affirmed by the CT-Supreme Court.