 ##  [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1723844076 - 2088775675](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1723844076-2088775675) 

  [![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/2022-10/BJ.jpg?itok=OFA5vUFc)](/individual/brooke-%20jenkins)Brooke Jenkins

 









 

 



 

 

**[San Francisco District Attorney](/california/san-francisco-district-attorney)**

350 Rhode Island Street, North Building, Suite 400N

San Francisco, California 94103

[(628) 652-4000](tel:%28628%29652-4000)

<districtattorney@sfgov.org>

[https://www.sfdistr…](https://www.sfdistrictattorney.org)





 

 



 

 

 [![San Francisco District Attorney](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/2022-03/download%20-%202022-03-13T160427.094.jpg?itok=3l61wCcj "San Francisco District Attorney")](/california/san-francisco-district-attorney)





 

 



 

 

 





## Date of Offense

Date Not Provided





 

 



 

 

## Offense(s)

[Attorney Misconduct](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/attorney-misconduct)





 

 



 

 

 





## Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the [State Bar of California](/california/state-bar-california)





 

 



 

 

 





## Supporting Document(s)

 [State Bar Complaint](/sites/default/files/2022-10/600397874-Brooke-Jenkins-State-Bar-Complaint-1.pdf "600397874-Brooke-Jenkins-State-Bar-Complaint-1.pdf")

 [Fox KTVU News Article](/sites/default/files/2022-10/State%20Bar%20complaint%20filed%20against%20SF%20interim%20D.A.%20Jenkins%20by%20retired%20judge.pdf "State Bar complaint filed against SF interim D.A. Jenkins by retired judge.pdf")

 

 

 

## Statement

The following is taken from the Fox KTVU news article...

> The complaint alleges Jenkins violated State Bar rules and the Business and Professions code through acts of dishonesty. Retired Superior Court Judge Martha Goldin filed the complaint on Thursday.
> 
> The misconduct allegations are outlined in the complaint and date as far back as a case Jenkins prosecuted in 2014 as the assistant district attorney. In 2016, a San Francisco appellate court reversed convictions in the case as a result of prosecutorial misconduct by Jenkins.
> 
> A press release from [The Wren Collective](https://www.wrencollective.org/), a research and policy group dedicated to criminal justice reform, said, "the appellate court found that Jenkins was guilty of a form of misconduct known as Griffin error, when a prosecutor violates constitutional protections by improperly commenting to the jury on a defendant’s failure to testify."
> 
> The claim accuses Jenkins of lying last month during a district attorney candidate debate when she said, "I want to make clear first and foremost never have I ever been found to have committed misconduct in a case."
> 
> Aside from allegations of lying, the claim accuses Jenkins of false and misleading representations, criminal conduct, and deceptive claims of attorney-client privilege.