 ##  [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1663714065 - 1229609475](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1663714065-1229609475) 

  [![](/sites/default/files/styles/square_500_x_500_/public/default_images/download%20%289%29%20%282%29_0.jpg?itok=5WstKkf1)](/individual/alexander-%20hayes)Alexander Hayes

 









 

 



 

 

**[Clackamas County District Attorney](/oregon/clackamas-county-district-attorney)**

807 Main Street

Oregon City, Oregon 97045

[503-655-8431](tel:503-655-8431)

<districtattorney@clackamas.us>

[https://www.clackam…](https://www.clackamas.us/da)





 

 



 

 

 [![Clackamas County District Attorney](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/2022-06/da-seal.png?itok=8JDBBku_ "Clackamas County District Attorney")](/oregon/clackamas-county-district-attorney)





 

 



 

 

 





## Date of Offense

Date Not Provided





 

 



 

 

## Offense(s)

[Cooperative Misconduct](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty-adjacent/cooperative-misconduct)





 

 



 

 

 





## Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the [Oregon State Bar](/oregon/oregon-state-bar)





 

 



 

 

 





## Statement

At the Supression hearing for my case the DA tells the judge that "even though more evidence is needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the state believes that reasonable suspicion was met based on the length of time between car being reported lost and me arrested. ( 2 days) Why is the prosecution admitting that the evidence is not enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt yet still is prosecuting the case and not moving to dismiss Attached is the suppression hearing audio https://photos.app.goo.gl/Mas1Jaiip8TdZTQH7